South Atlantic Anomaly
Swarm satellites have observed a weak-field region expanding from 2014 to 2025. This is a recent observational context, not evidence that a reversal is imminent.
ESA Swarm analysis ↗GEOMAGNETISM / 01
Explore modeled magnetic-pole movement from the Holocene to today. Choose a source and epoch, then zoom and pan the map.
NOAA modeled dip-pole positions. Select a year to see the two poles.
Explore the last reversal ↓Loading data…
Angular distance from the equator, in degrees. Both series use absolute latitude for comparison.
Great-circle distance since the previous model epoch divided by elapsed years. CALS10k.2 values average 50 years (40 for the last interval).
Dipole moment from independent field-model coefficients. NOAA pole positions and field intensity are separate model products; the GUFM1/IGRF boundary is marked at 1900, and the shaded GUFM1 years before 1840 rely on an extrapolated g₁⁰.
These observations come from other instruments and archives. They share a time axis with the selected series, but none of them is used to calculate the poles or the field.
Data unavailable.
Declination calculated at London from GUFM1 and IGRF-14, with three early measurements. Gellibrand's comparison of these readings in 1634 revealed that declination changes with time.
Early readings are rounded and come from different London sites; they are not corrected to the model location. Gunter’s 1622 marker is ≈6° E, rounded from his Limehouse table.
Gunter (1673), p. 279 ↗Annual mean sunspot number, SILSO version 2.0, from 1749. Solar activity drives the external field and aurorae; it does not move the core field's dip poles.
Annual mean excess length of day from IERS, in milliseconds. Decadal changes are largely attributed to exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle; jerks are abrupt changes in the field's secular variation.
Select a storm to show it on the map. The dashed line is the authors' equatorward auroral boundary, drawn here with the dipole of the same year; the band shows the usual auroral zone near 65–70° geomagnetic latitude.
IntCal20 Δ¹⁴C, in ‰. A weaker dipole lets more cosmic rays produce ¹⁴C, but solar activity and the carbon cycle also shape this curve. Marked years are extreme solar particle events found in tree rings.
A separate reconstruction of the global magnetic field, 900,000–700,000 years ago. Explore the signed axial dipole as the field changed polarity.
The same GGFMB epochs, in 10²² A·m². A weak field accompanies the polarity transition.
The shaded 799–770 ka interval is the authors' approximate reversal window. GGFMB is a model from sediment records; during transition the field is complex, so a single north/south pole path would be misleading.
Marine sediment records show increased cosmogenic ¹⁰Be production around the Matuyama–Brunhes transition as the dipole weakened. Their age models and sampling differ from GGFMB, so no point-by-point correlation is implied here.
Read the sediment study ↗Normal (light) and reversed (dark) polarity from the GTS2012 timescale, with two dated excursions. The bracket marks the 900–700 ka GGFMB window above.
Data unavailable.
Swarm satellites have observed a weak-field region expanding from 2014 to 2025. This is a recent observational context, not evidence that a reversal is imminent.
ESA Swarm analysis ↗The curves use different models, timescales and resolutions. A pole's drift rate, a regional weak-field patch and a global polarity reversal describe different aspects of the magnetic field.
Magnetic dip poles are where Earth's magnetic field is vertical. NOAA supplies annual modeled positions for 1590–2025; CALS10k.2 is a separate Holocene reconstruction from 8000 BCE.
For CALS10k.2, cubic splines define spherical-harmonic coefficients through time. We solve for zero north and east field components at sea level. Lines join model epochs, not annual observations.
Predictive modeled magnetic dip poles, separate from the historical series.
WMM2025 ↗ North SouthCALS10k.2 is available in the separate historical view. Other models reach farther back, but their pole paths have not been computed here.
CALS10k.2 and NOAA are distinct models and give different positions in 1590. Their paths are separate; uncertainty grows farther into the past.
This atlas is an independent educational visualization. It redraws published magnetic-field models and surveys with their own numbers, in your browser, and does not produce new scientific results. Every value shown is a model result or a published measurement, with its source linked where it appears.
The atlas itself makes no network request at runtime once its files are loaded, and share links carry only the selected view. Audience measurement (Google Analytics) runs only if you accept it; the choice is stored on this device.
Report an error or a missing source ↗Source code and data scripts ↗